Every answer.
An evidence trail.
Live lending data. Traceable analysis. A signed receipt
you can take anywhere and verify independently.
Follow the utilization.
Compare two lending markets using live onchain data. Which has higher utilization, and what should an analyst monitor next?
A bounded query. No transactions. No wallet connection.
Start with the source.
Run the comparison to inspect real market data, its indexed block, and the exact query behind every claim.
Your research, with a receipt.
Source evidence and analysis, bound by an ML-DSA-65 signature.
This receipt verifies the signed content against a specified public key. It does not prove that the data provider is honest, that the AI analysis is correct, or that Ethereum itself is quantum-resistant.
Research prototype · security limitations
Post-quantum protection applies to this receipt signature. It does not upgrade Ethereum accounts, consensus, API transport, or funds. Signed misinformation is still possible. Issuance and observation times are signer claims, not trusted timestamps. Key distribution, protection, and rotation remain separate trust problems. This hackathon prototype has not been independently audited.